By Marc S. Sanders
Brian DePalma’s Blow Out is an inventive approach to the political conspiracy thriller. In 1981, following a mask of innocence the United States lost with the assassination of President Kennedy, later his brother Bobby, plus the drunken, liable carelessness of their brother Ted, and then finally the Watergate scandal, DePalma capitalized on newsworthy incidents to make a paranoid thriller of present day while incorporating what he likely knows much about which is sound effects editing. Despite the cheesy music soundtrack that is highly intrusive and poorly composed, Blow Out is a good blend of hysteria and suspense.
John Travolta plays Jack Terry, a Philadelphia sound effects recording artist for b-grade schlock horror movies. One night, while out in a park trying to pick up sounds of outdoor nature, he witnesses a car suffer a blown-out tire and crash into a nearby river. Jack is able to rescue a woman named Sally (Nancy Allen) but cannot save the Pennsylvania governor who was driving the car.
As he is about to leave the hospital, he is specifically instructed to never speak to Sally nor acknowledge to anyone about any of his own involvement in this incident. However, Jack cannot help but recount the sequence of events in his head and as new details come to light, he knows that there is a cover up at play.
Blow Up operates like a how-to kind of picture. The expertise of a sound effects recording artist is demonstrated as Jack replays every sound that his equipment picked up. Later he’s able to manufacture his own film by assembling a series of published photographs that also captured the crash. Sync up the sounds with the sights and a new theory surfaces. Other mysteries change the course of the riddle through dialogue. This character has to work by himself using the skills he’s acquired to learn the truth. He hardly has anyone to commiserate with.
John Travolta is convincing within this occupation that’s not as common as a cop or a private eye. I like how I can pick up how he uses his recording equipment and even the minute details like labeling what he has preserved within his inventory.
It took a little bit of patience to get used to Nancy Allen’s damsel in distress who plays it up like Judy Holliday or Jean Hagen with the squeaky, dingbat voice. When we first meet her, she is in an intoxicated stupor that goes on a little too long. Nevertheless, I came around because the tension of the film builds quite well.
John Lithgow is the sadistic adversary – a serial killer and assassin rolled into one. He’s got the weird, unwelcome appearance like any bad guy in a Hitchcock film.
DePalma is known for his split screen cuts that he offered in Carrie and later in Mission: Impossible. More well known is his reliance on bringing a character in zoom close up, while in the same frame, another object will be zoomed out at a distance. During an outdoor evening in the park, an owl hoots and stares us down while John Travolta is far in the background standing on a bridge. Within this same moment, DePalma does it again with a toad ribbiting up close with the actor again positioned out. It’s a disorienting approach that works well at maintaining the perplexity of his story.
I think the final act of Blow Out falls apart a bit. Travolta is on the heels of rescuing Sally by rampaging his jeep through a crowded parade. The scene is shot so aggressively that it was hard for me to believe he would survive much less not run down a cop, spectator, or the entire marching band. DePalma could have tightened this up a bit.
Blow Out ends on a bleak irony that’s quite surprising and definitely against formula. There’s a running gag for Jack and a film director as they edit a silly problematic issue for a new slasher flick. I guessed early on how this was going to resolve itself. Though I was right, I didn’t expect how the conclusion arrived at my predication.
As well, there are some notable questions left unanswered. I had to roll back and see if I missed something. I didn’t. DePalma’s script neglects some key points with unfinished resolutions. So, I was not entirely satisfied. Still, the how-to procedures along with the pursuit of the truth, while also evading demise, are very engaging.
When I conduct workshops on playwriting, I always recommend keeping up with the news. An unending wealth of ideas are there to be discovered. As a sincere compliment to Brian DePalma, it could not be more apparent where his creativity took off with this film. As a skilled and educated filmmaker, he also writes what he knows.
Blow Out is very close to being a smart nail biter that echoes the sad truths of political rule breaking by means of savage crime. I wish modern films would be as risky today. There are so few of these kinds of thrillers being made anymore.

I remember seeing this in the theater when it was first released and I thought it was really something. Like you, I knew it wasn’t perfect–I think the reason Nancy Allen was a bit annoying was because she was also Mrs. DePalma at the time (hence the endless lingerie and stockings with garters, one of his personal fetishes as he used to say.) But there were moments I didn’t see coming and one of the murders was particularly effective because all you could see were the girl’s feet. Your imagination did the rest of it for you and it was twice as frightening because of that.
I liked the way Travolta played his character, smart and savvy but not a smart ass. I liked how much he observed and captured, and the final moments, listening to Sally but unable to get to her broke my heart. So too his using her voice for that awful movie, and the look on his face.
While this movie could’ve been more, it was so much more than I had expected it would be, and I still watch it now and then if I catch it on the TV.
LikeLike